@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix this: <http://purl.org/np/RANr0kZ7DZbvZCZAm6XFj3FQVntC82Zw0Ky1UTtFr2kQw> .
@prefix sub: <http://purl.org/np/RANr0kZ7DZbvZCZAm6XFj3FQVntC82Zw0Ky1UTtFr2kQw#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix pav: <http://purl.org/pav/> .
@prefix np: <http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#> .
@prefix doco: <http://purl.org/spar/doco/> .
@prefix c4o: <http://purl.org/spar/c4o/> .
sub:Head {
  this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion ;
    np:hasProvenance sub:provenance ;
    np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo ;
    a np:Nanopublication .
}
sub:assertion {
  sub:paragraph c4o:hasContent "Concerning FEs, we observe that COMPETIZIONE is frequently mistaken for PREMIO and ENTITÀ , while rarely for TEMPO and DURATA , or just missed. On the other hand, TEMPO is mistaken for COMPETIZIONE : our hypothesis is that competition mentions, such as World Cup 2014, are disambiguated as a whole entity by the linker, since a specific target Wikipedia article exists. However, it overlaps with a temporal expression, thus confusing the classifier. AGENTE is often mistaken for ENTITÀ , due to their equivalent semantic type, which is always a person. Finally, we notice that some FEs (i.e., SQUADRA_1, SQUADRA_2 and CLASSIFICA) did not appear in the training set, but did in the gold standard, and viceversa (i.e., ENTITÀ )." ;
    a doco:Paragraph .
}
sub:provenance {
  sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource <http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-170269> ;
    prov:wasAttributedTo <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5456-7964> .
}
sub:pubinfo {
  this: dc:created "2019-11-10T18:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
    pav:createdBy <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459> .
}