http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#Head
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#assertion
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#provenance
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#pubinfo
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#assertion
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText
Some claims should be toned down. For example, in Section 3 (Use case) when the authors motivate the reason behind their choice of adopting the Soccer domain for the use case, they argue that 5% of the whole English Wikipedia is a significant portion of the whole chapter. However, 5% can be hardly considered a significant portion of a dataset/sample. Moreover, this ratio is provided with respect to the English Wikipedia, while in the rest of the paper and in the evaluation the authors use the Italian Wikipedia. Hence, the ratio should be provided with respect to the Italian Wikipedia or at least the authors should motivate this incoherence.
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact
3
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo
http://purl.org/np/RAB-PN0DdvG7rBootEUd1ha_jOYwCKnPZmLl4oJr1qIdo#section
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#provenance
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#assertion
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-170269
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#assertion
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-9496
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#pubinfo
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4
http://purl.org/dc/terms/created
2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00
http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4
http://purl.org/pav/createdBy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459