http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#Head http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4 http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#assertion http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4 http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#provenance http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4 http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#assertion http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText Some claims should be toned down. For example, in Section 3 (Use case) when the authors motivate the reason behind their choice of adopting the Soccer domain for the use case, they argue that 5% of the whole English Wikipedia is a significant portion of the whole chapter. However, 5% can be hardly considered a significant portion of a dataset/sample. Moreover, this ratio is provided with respect to the English Wikipedia, while in the rest of the paper and in the evaluation the authors use the Italian Wikipedia. Hence, the ratio should be provided with respect to the Italian Wikipedia or at least the authors should motivate this incoherence. http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact 3 http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#comment-6 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo http://purl.org/np/RAB-PN0DdvG7rBootEUd1ha_jOYwCKnPZmLl4oJr1qIdo#section http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#provenance http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-170269 http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2928-9496 http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4 http://purl.org/dc/terms/created 2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00 http://purl.org/np/RAQJx4I44FxAdQIJQN7NLGaNLPpWQ4hhDRJ3JHZkbLFB4 http://purl.org/pav/createdBy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459