@prefix dc: .
@prefix this: .
@prefix sub: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix prov: .
@prefix pav: .
@prefix np: .
@prefix linkflows: .
sub:Head {
this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion;
np:hasProvenance sub:provenance;
np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo;
a np:Nanopublication .
}
sub:assertion {
sub:comment-3 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment, linkflows:ContentComment, linkflows:NeutralComment,
linkflows:ReviewComment;
linkflows:hasCommentText "The problem addressed is a rather interesting one, giving first insights in how to adapt crowdsourcing to LDQ issues. From my point of view, I would have liked to see a more concise comparison of the two crowdsourcing approaches also with the sophisticated state-of-the-art automated tools. ";
linkflows:hasImpact "5"^^xsd:positiveInteger;
linkflows:refersTo .
}
sub:provenance {
sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource ;
prov:wasAttributedTo .
}
sub:pubinfo {
this: dc:created "2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime;
pav:createdBy .
}