. . . . . . "application/x-texinfo" . . . . "application/pdf" . . . . "Erik Schultes" . "Luiz Bonino" . "Mark Wilkinson" . "Michel Dumontier" . "Peter Doorn" . "Susanna Sansone" . "Use FAIR Vocabularies" . "FAIR Metric for Fair Principle I2" . . . "FAIR Metrics Working Group" . "michel: there must be a syntax and associated semantics for that language. This is sufficient \n mark: there needs to be some identity or denotation in the language; ('vanilla') xml and json are not FAIR, so should fail this test\n \n *** can you (i) identify elements and (ii) make statements about them, and iii) is there a formally defined interpretation for that -> HTML fails; PDF fails \n shared\n -> that there are many users of the language\n . acknowledged within your community\n -> hard to prove.\n . could we use google to query for your filetype (can't discriminate between different models)\n -> has a media type\n --> This SHOULD be stated as a IANA code [IANA-MT]\n standardization of at least this listing process is a good measure of 'sharedness'\n broadly applicable\n . that the language is extensible to a domain of interest\n . you can define your own elements in accordance with the semantics of the language\n \n gff3 is not in the IANA list -> what steps would the community need to execute to be listed here? cases like GFF, PDB are not broadly applicable \n biopax -> is defined vnd.biopax.rdf+xml and built on rdf -> allows users to create new elements and relate them \n jpg -> widely used, registered, but primarily for image content\n pdf -> registered, enables users to create their own dictionary.\n " . "None" . "The metadata values and qualified relations should themselves be FAIR, for example, terms from open, community-accepted vocabularies published in an appropriate knowledge-exchange format." . "Resolve IRIs, check FAIRness of the returned document(s)." . "It is not possible to unambiguously interpret metadata represented as simple keywords or other non-qualified symbols. For interoperability, it must be possible to identify data that can be integrated like-with-like. This requires that the data, and the provenance descriptors of the data, should (where reasonable) use vocabularies and terminologies that are, themselves, FAIR." . "All" . "IRIs representing the vocabularies used for (meta)data " . "Successful resolution; document is amenable to machine-parsing and identification of terms within it. It may be possible to use FAIRSharing to validate these vocabularies." . "2017-11-21T00:00:00.0Z"^^ . . . "Mark Wilkinson" . . "1" .