Nanopublications

@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix this: <http://purl.org/np/RAXLxyFaqg9NT1DqPB49USIO-7ymJHEupPPvK6Faw1IYY> .
@prefix sub: <http://purl.org/np/RAXLxyFaqg9NT1DqPB49USIO-7ymJHEupPPvK6Faw1IYY#> .
@prefix f3: <http://purl.org/np/RAllHpa22UVMDTHKkHYAm4ob73_y9VvRWon1Rhnf-EJQc> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix pav: <http://purl.org/pav/> .
@prefix np: <http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#> .
@prefix linkflows: <https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#> .

sub:Head {
  this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion ;
    np:hasProvenance sub:provenance ;
    np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo ;
    a np:Nanopublication .
}

sub:assertion {
  sub:comment-14 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment , linkflows:ContentComment , linkflows:NegativeComment , linkflows:ReviewComment ;
    linkflows:hasCommentText "Regarding the MTurk-based Find stage, I personally find the screenshot in Figure 3 very confusing, since it seems that the Wikipedia column (which should provide the \"human readable\" information) is less complete that the DBpedia column: how were the workers expected to interpret this fact? were they instructed to click on the Wikipedia page link (if provided) to check?" ;
    linkflows:hasImpact "4"^^xsd:positiveInteger ;
    linkflows:refersTo <http://purl.org/np/RAllHpa22UVMDTHKkHYAm4ob73_y9VvRWon1Rhnf-EJQc#figure> .
}

sub:provenance {
sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource <http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239> ;
prov:wasAttributedTo <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-7193> .
}

sub:pubinfo {
this: dc:created "2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
pav:createdBy <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459> .
}