@prefix dc: . @prefix this: . @prefix sub: . @prefix f3: . @prefix xsd: . @prefix prov: . @prefix pav: . @prefix np: . @prefix linkflows: . sub:Head { this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion; np:hasProvenance sub:provenance; np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo; a np:Nanopublication . } sub:assertion { sub:comment-14 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment, linkflows:ContentComment, linkflows:NegativeComment, linkflows:ReviewComment; linkflows:hasCommentText "Regarding the MTurk-based Find stage, I personally find the screenshot in Figure 3 very confusing, since it seems that the Wikipedia column (which should provide the \"human readable\" information) is less complete that the DBpedia column: how were the workers expected to interpret this fact? were they instructed to click on the Wikipedia page link (if provided) to check?"; linkflows:hasImpact "4"^^xsd:positiveInteger; linkflows:refersTo f3:\#figure . } sub:provenance { sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource ; prov:wasAttributedTo . } sub:pubinfo { this: dc:created "2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime; pav:createdBy . }