@prefix dc: <
http://purl.org/dc/terms/
> .
@prefix this: <
http://purl.org/np/RAi81vbUpErgO7pWByu-mTiXYmADHjQzZ6Wa0aVJTZGro
> .
@prefix sub: <
http://purl.org/np/RAi81vbUpErgO7pWByu-mTiXYmADHjQzZ6Wa0aVJTZGro#
> .
@prefix s5: <
http://purl.org/np/RAM-yH09ej0-6nTAW7LqZ_RrkMgnmB2jZLoo4YjKwVUAQ
> .
@prefix xsd: <
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
> .
@prefix prov: <
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
> .
@prefix pav: <
http://purl.org/pav/
> .
@prefix np: <
http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#
> .
@prefix linkflows: <
https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#
> .
sub:Head
{
this:
np:hasAssertion
sub:assertion
;
np:hasProvenance
sub:provenance
;
np:hasPublicationInfo
sub:pubinfo
;
a
np:Nanopublication
.
}
sub:assertion
{
sub:comment-16
a
linkflows:ActionNeededComment
,
linkflows:ContentComment
,
linkflows:NegativeComment
,
linkflows:ReviewComment
;
linkflows:hasCommentText
"- Sect.5. Actually, ifcowl is just the ontology T-box and it does not include proper instances. It is suggested to use IFC-RDF graph (or something else) when referring to the instances. This means also that querying the ifcowl instances are not returned (cf. sect.6.1.)" ;
linkflows:hasImpact
"3"^^
xsd:positiveInteger
;
linkflows:refersTo
<
http://purl.org/np/RAM-yH09ej0-6nTAW7LqZ_RrkMgnmB2jZLoo4YjKwVUAQ#section
> .
}
sub:provenance
{
sub:assertion
prov:hadPrimarySource
<
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-180298
> ;
prov:wasAttributedTo
<
https://orcid.org/0000-0000-0000-0000
> .
}
sub:pubinfo
{
this:
dc:created
"2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^
xsd:dateTime
;
pav:createdBy
<
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459
> .
}