@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix this: <http://purl.org/np/RAi81vbUpErgO7pWByu-mTiXYmADHjQzZ6Wa0aVJTZGro> .
@prefix sub: <http://purl.org/np/RAi81vbUpErgO7pWByu-mTiXYmADHjQzZ6Wa0aVJTZGro#> .
@prefix s5: <http://purl.org/np/RAM-yH09ej0-6nTAW7LqZ_RrkMgnmB2jZLoo4YjKwVUAQ> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix pav: <http://purl.org/pav/> .
@prefix np: <http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#> .
@prefix linkflows: <https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#> .

sub:Head {
  this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion;
    np:hasProvenance sub:provenance;
    np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo;
    a np:Nanopublication .
}

sub:assertion {
  sub:comment-16 a linkflows:ActionNeededComment, linkflows:ContentComment, linkflows:NegativeComment,
      linkflows:ReviewComment;
    linkflows:hasCommentText "- Sect.5. Actually, ifcowl is just the ontology T-box and it does not include proper instances. It is suggested to use IFC-RDF graph (or something else) when referring to the instances. This means also that querying the ifcowl instances are not returned (cf. sect.6.1.)";
    linkflows:hasImpact "3"^^xsd:positiveInteger;
    linkflows:refersTo s5:\#section .
}

sub:provenance {
  sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource <http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-180298>;
    prov:wasAttributedTo <https://orcid.org/0000-0000-0000-0000> .
}

sub:pubinfo {
  this: dc:created "2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime;
    pav:createdBy <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459> .
}