@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix orcid: <https://orcid.org/> .
@prefix this: <http://purl.org/np/RAof-Rjk6NQNqEeyggSx8c1vtP_6HnDOEaoIQrSmk3DX4> .
@prefix sub: <http://purl.org/np/RAof-Rjk6NQNqEeyggSx8c1vtP_6HnDOEaoIQrSmk3DX4#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix pav: <http://purl.org/pav/> .
@prefix np: <http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#> .
@prefix doco: <http://purl.org/spar/doco/> .
@prefix c4o: <http://purl.org/spar/c4o/> .
sub:Head {
  this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion ;
    np:hasProvenance sub:provenance ;
    np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo ;
    a np:Nanopublication .
}
sub:assertion {
  sub:paragraph c4o:hasContent "In this paper, we proposed and compared crowdsourcing mechanisms to evaluate the quality of Linked Data (LD); the study was conducted in particular on the DBpedia dataset. Two different types of crowds and mechanisms were investigated for the initial detec- tion of quality issues: object value, datatype and language tags, and interlinks. We secondly focused on adapting the Find-Fix-Verify crowdsourcing pattern to exploit the strengths of experts and lay workers and leverage the results from the Find-only approaches." ;
    a doco:Paragraph .
}
sub:provenance {
  sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource <http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-160239> ;
    prov:wasAttributedTo orcid:0000-0003-0530-4305 .
}
sub:pubinfo {
  this: dcterms:created "2019-11-10T18:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
    pav:createdBy orcid:0000-0002-7114-6459 .
}