Nanopublications

@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix this: <http://purl.org/np/RAr5j9QKNLke7aKgvY47eJGj7tppq4xhVyDspiCq26fFA> .
@prefix sub: <http://purl.org/np/RAr5j9QKNLke7aKgvY47eJGj7tppq4xhVyDspiCq26fFA#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix pav: <http://purl.org/pav/> .
@prefix np: <http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#> .
@prefix linkflows: <https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#> .

sub:Head {
  this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion ;
    np:hasProvenance sub:provenance ;
    np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo ;
    a np:Nanopublication .
}

sub:assertion {
  sub:comment-6 a linkflows:ContentComment , linkflows:NegativeComment , linkflows:ReviewComment , linkflows:SuggestionComment ;
    linkflows:hasCommentText "As a global recommendation, I suggest the authors to honestly rephrase the parts of the paper that would try to convince the readers about a possible general validity of the paper results for any LD source and/or for any LD quality issue." ;
    linkflows:hasImpact "4"^^xsd:positiveInteger ;
    linkflows:refersTo <http://purl.org/np/RAnVHrB5TSxLeOc6XTVafmd9hvosbs4c-4Ck0XRh_CgGk#articleVersion1> .
}

sub:provenance {
sub:assertion prov:hadPrimarySource <http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-160239> ;
prov:wasAttributedTo <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-7193> .
}

sub:pubinfo {
this: dc:created "2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
pav:createdBy <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459> .
}